TITLE: Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk: A Modest Bestiary AUTHOR: David Sedaris
STARTED: March 8, 2011
FINISHED: March 8, 2011
PAGES:176
GENRE: Fiction
FIRST SENTENCE: The cat had a party to attend, and went to the baboon to get herself groomed.
SUMMARY: [From Amazon.com]
The ancient Greeks had Aesop, seventeenth-century French people read the fables of La Fontaine, and now we, jaded inhabitants of the modern era, possess the distinct privilege to enjoy the beloved Sedaris’ first collection of short animal tales. The appeal of this aesthetically pleasing little volume is inherent, as the American ambassador of the comedy memoir, human division, turns now to creatures of the hoofed and winged variety to make us laugh and, perhaps, learn a lesson. Illustrations by Falconer (of the Olivia children’s books) are a perfect pairing for Sedaris’ stories (both writer and illustrator have been published extensively in the New Yorker). In Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk, foibled fabular heroines are given the opportunity to, finally, display all those humanlike thoughts and behaviors they’ve been banned from for ages. There’s the motherless bear who alienates herself with her incessant, self-centered solicitations of pity, and the potbellied pig who, no matter the diet, just can’t lose his breed-inherited descriptor. It’s impossible to imagine the brainstorm that conjured up these absurd, animated tales, but readers will certainly be grateful that they rained from Sedaris’ pen. THOUGHTS: Um... what? This book just confused me. Sedaris is an author who normally makes me laugh, or at least gets me to crack a smile. This book just weirded me out. I don't get the point of it. Was this book supposed to be a modern Aesop's fables? cautionary tales? study in absurd fiction? I just don't know what to do with this book. Some people will love this strange collection of animal tales, but I am not sure I'm one of them.
We read this for my bookclub and I think we're going to have quite an interesting conversation about the stories.
Still... what the heck was that?
RATING: 4/10 [An "okay" book]
Comments