TITLE: April in ParisAUTHOR: Michael Wallner
STARTED: March 22, 2008
FINISHED: March 25, 2008
PAGES: 248
GENRE: Fiction
FIRST SENTENCE: I learned about the transfer before noon.
SUMMARY: [From barnesandnoble.com] n 1943, Michel Roth is a young soldier working in the German army’s back offices in occupied Paris. But his fluency in French gets Roth a new task when the Gestapo find themselves in need of a translator for the confessions of interrogated French resisters.
After work Roth chooses another path – he slips out of his hotel carrying a bag of civilian clothes and steals into an alley where he changes personas, becoming Monsieur Antoine, a young Frenchman. He strolls the streets of Paris, where one day he meets Chantal, daughter of an antiquarian bookseller. They fall in love, and when Chantal warns him away from the notorious café Turachevsky, favoured nightspot for German officers and the French women who entertain them, Michel believes it is out of jealousy. Too late he discovers that she is a member of the Resistance, and his naiveté leaves Michel on the other side of the SS interrogation machine.
What follows is a tale of desperate cat and mouse through Paris, and into the devastated French countryside at the end of the war, when neighbours are quick to betray neighbours, and even to take revenge into their own hands.
THOUGHTS: This book was clearly written by a screenplay writer. The images are incredibly vivid and easy to imagine. Character development, on the otherhand, seems to drop by the wayside. This book paints a beautiful picture of WWII era Paris. The streets come alive with the sights and sounds of the era. I had no trouble imagining the environment or the actions of the characters. The plot left me wanting. It felt too simplistic for what the dust jacket lays out. I was expecting my suspense and more intrigue. I got stock characters and one-dimensional drama. Not a bad book, but definitely far from a great one. Also, for a book that places so much stock in the connection between the two leads, the romance was incredibly lacking.
RATING: 5/10 [Meh.]
Comments